Category: Science and Technology

A Real World ‘Star Trek’ Replicator Is Now Possible Thanks To New Breakthrough

 

by Eric Mack                 March 9, 2018                  (forbes.com)

• The New York-based Mattershift, a start-up business founded by alumni from MIT and Yale, has reported in the journal Science Advances that they’ve successfully created a ‘replicator’ machine that can 3-d print literally anything out of thin air using large-scale carbon nanotube (CNT) membranes that are able to combine and separate individual molecules.

• Mattershift’s approach is more about separating and combining molecules to form new raw materials, which is why working on creating fuels is a logical place to start. Mattershift founder and CEO Dr. Rob McGinnis says, “[R]ight now we’re working to remove CO2 from the air and turn it into fuels. This has already been done using conventional technology… Using our tech, I think we’ll be able to produce carbon-zero gasoline, diesel, and jet fuels that are cheaper than fossil fuels.”

• “It should be possible… to make anything we need from basic molecular building blocks,” said McGinnis. “We’re talking about printing matter from the air. Imagine having one of these devices with you on Mars. You could print food, fuels, building materials, and medicines from the atmosphere and soil or recycled parts without having to transport them from Earth.”

• [Editor’s Note]  This certainly give credence to the claims by Corey Goode, Emery Smith, and other insiders that our secret space programs commonly use food replicators in its off-planet and underground facilities, which draws molecules from food scraps and the air to make various types of meals. It is said that these foods are particularly healthy and tasty because they are not grown from pesticide and chemical-infested mega-farm fields, and processed with food additives. So the replicated food tastes pure and fresh and is more healthy. This is a technology that should be among the first to be available to the public, even though Monsanto will surely attempt to suppress this technology.

 

A startup with alumni from MIT and Yale says it’s made a breakthrough in creating a next-generation material that should make it possible to 3-d print literally anything out of thin air.

New York-based Mattershift has managed to create large-scale carbon nanotube (CNT) membranes that are able to combine and separate individual molecules.

“This technology gives us a level of control over the material world that we’ve never had before,” said Mattershift Founder and CEO Dr. Rob McGinnis in a release. “For example, right now we’re working to remove CO2 from the air and turn it into fuels. This has already been done using conventional technology, but it’s been too expensive to be practical. Using our tech, I think we’ll be able to produce carbon-zero gasoline, diesel, and jet fuels that are cheaper than fossil fuels.

CONTINUE HERE.

Patent Office Silly Excuses for Illegally Suppressing Extraordinary Technology

 

Saturday, March 16, 2019 10:13

The previous article, Citizen Initiative Aims to End War on Extraordinary Technologies, revealed the secret illegal Sensitive Application Warning System (SAWS) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). It began in 1994, early in the administration of President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore, and ended late in President Obama’s administration, only because the USPTO was busted and exposed in the news media. President Trump did not inherit the illegal USPTO program from President Obama, but he did inherit an ongoing hostile environment toward extraordinary technologies.

In response to that illegal program, a group of Denver citizens, including me, recently proposed a new law that was first suggested in POWER UP – How to Create a Solution-Based World in 100 Days. The article included the full text of the proposed law and a sample ballot question that could appear in any of thousands of cities around the U.S. Maybe President Trump should put one of those crime scene ribbons around the USPTO and finally investigate who created the illegal SAWS program.

Why bother trying to create a local patent office? Kate Goudry, a patent attorney, described why the secret USPTO SAWS program was unconstitutional, and therefore illegal. In summary, she explained that it was illegally secret, did not follow any law or the rules of the USPTO, was vague, and arbitrarily targeted specific categories of patent applications. Her analysis includes a partial but lengthy “hit list” of patent applications.

Again, they included:

  • “Anti-global warming devices or any other device operating at the global scale”
  • “Motor, power plant, or other device which is self-sustaining (perpetual motion) or appears to violate the laws of chemistry or physics”
  • “Claiming prevention or curing of diseases which were previously considered impossible to prevent or cure.” [i.e. cancer, AIDS and HIV, Alzheimer’s, etc.]
  • “Applications which would potentially generate unwanted media coverage (i.e., news, blogs, forums)”

The last category is downright silly. Instead of celebrating breakthrough inventions through the news media, the USPTO obstructed or delayed applications for such inventions to avoid unwanted publicity. The USPTO website finally admitted that the SAWS program existed. Not surprisingly, it tried to explain that the program was meant to ensure “quality patents”, even though SAWS was clearly illegal and unconstitutional.  It stated, in part:

“The Sensitive Application Warning System (SAWS) program is one of many practical, internal efforts that the USPTO has in place to ensure that only the highest quality patents are issued by the Agency.” It goes on to state, “This quality assurance program applies to all pending patent applications that disclose potential SAWS subject matter, which typically represent a very small percentage of all pending applications in an average month, usually around 0.04%.”

Sounds reasonable, right? However, that is what you call, “damage control through brazen spin” or “D.C. – B.S.”, if you know what I mean. The entire patent office explanation of the SAWS program never mentions the secret or other illegal aspects of SAWS.

CONTINUE READING HERE.

Mill Valley, California, blocks 5G cell tower implementation

 

14 November 2018

Citing concerns of cancer and other health risks, the city has moved to block the installation of 5G cell phone technology, writes Matt Agorist. Published in New Thought Project on November 12, 2018.

The city voted unanimously to effectively halt the installation of new small cell towers which carry the 5G technology by enacting an “urgency ordinance” after it received over a hundred letters from concerned citizens expressing their worries over the new 5G towers.

Mill Valley residents cited multiple studies which claim that experts have found evidence that cell phone radiation can cause cancer.

CONTINUE READING HERE.

DOD Officials Warn Trump Administration To Stop Hassling Giant 5G Developer

 

Department of Defense officials are warning the Trump administration to stop targeting telecommunications giant Qualcomm or risk placing the U.S. behind the eight ball on fifth generation cellular development.

Representatives with both the DOD and Energy Department have had sit-down discussions with the Federal Trade Commission to encourage the agency to stop suing Qualcomm, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, citing people familiar with the talks. They argue that financial losses from a court defeat would hamper Qualcomm’s ability to compete with China’s top chip maker, Huawei.

“There’s been a lot of contact from other arms of the government to express these concerns” to FTC’s commissioners, one of the representatives told WSJ. Securing 5G networks is “vital to the security and prosperity of the United States,” acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan said in a statement.

CONTINUE READING HERE.

Update on Protecting yourself from Smart Meter and other “dirty” fields

 

The other night I shared a video by Dustin Nemos showing the benefits of Shungite and its use in protecting against smart meter, wifi and other types of radiation.  I came across the video below and as you will see, this claim is highly dubious if not outright false.  I have contacted a woman who sells shungite and other crystals, sent her the video below and asked if she has done similar testing on her products as well as her thoughts on the video.  If there is one thing that immediately gets me it is deception – but then again many if not most of you already know that after having visited this site for some time.  So when I discover something I have shared may have been false (FAKE) information/news, I will tell you about it so you can make the best choice for yourself.

The second video below is another channel I found.  He speaks of the smart meters and how even the mesh covers – even the Faraday type covers – do not protect you from the dirty electrical fields that zap into your home via the wiring. !! (i did not know about that)  He links a company that has filters and other products to help protect yourself and your home from these fields.  Here is the link for that site: https://greenwavefilters.com/partners/278/

It’s so fucking insane to me and a cause I continue to follow (getting them outlawed AND getting REAL Clean Tech released)…

Love and perfect health to you all, as always,

Victoria

Published on Sep 21, 2018

 

Published on Aug 17, 2017

Staggering discovery reveals moon lies INSIDE Earth’s atmosphere

 

editor victoria’s comment ~ not a real moon.  you would think if we really did “go” to the moon, they would have known this back in the 60’s, right? discovered between 1996 and 1998 yet no release – instead it was just sitting in archives?  lol really now…..perhaps this is disclosure.  considering the source (NASA/SOHO) who knows…we’ve been moved around….maps are now different…..just interesting given the timing of this release…

******

Published time: 21 Feb, 2019 15:29

The Earth’s atmosphere is much bigger than previously thought, extending far beyond the Moon, a team of scientists have revealed. The amazing discovery was made thanks to data that has been sitting unexamined for over 20 years.

We now know that the atmosphere surrounding our planet stretches 630,000km (391,464 miles) away and is 50 times the diameter of Earth, thanks to the discovery and analysis of decades-old data by scientists at Russia’s Space Research Institute.

It means that the Moon is part of our atmosphere and not outside of it. In fact, it’s actually located right in the middle of our atmosphere, at an average distance of 384,400 kilometres (238,855 miles) from Earth.

“The Moon flies through Earth’s atmosphere,”explained study author physicist Igor Baliukin of Russia’s Space Research Institute.

The jaw-dropping data was collected by the NASA/European Space Agency Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) between 1996 and 1998 and had been gathering dust in an archive since then.

CONTINUE READING HERE.  

Trump to launch artificial intelligence initiative, but many details lacking

 

editor victoria’s comment ~ i realize many normies have AI already – google home, alexia, etc.  anything “AI” does not resonate with me likely because what we have here does not really work for us here (recording personal data under the guise of making our lives easier).  we already have machines that work w/the matrix masters to keep us enslaved so i have a big ‘ole mindset of speculation with this one….

******

By Matthew Hutson  

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a defining issue of our time, affecting national security, economic development, human rights, and social media—for better and worse. And today, President Donald Trump will sign an executive order launching the American AI Initiative, directing federal agencies to focus on the technology.

The administration has yet to provide many details, however, saying only that it will be assigning federal agencies specific timelines for “deliverables” and expects to release more information over the next 6 months.

The U.S. initiative, which follows on the heels of at least 18 other countries that have announced national AI strategies, will have five “key pillars,” a senior administration official told reporters yesterday during a telephone briefing. They are:

1) Research and development. The administration will ask agencies to “prioritize AI investments” in their spending, but did not detail how much funding the White House will request to support the initiative. (Congress ultimately determines spending levels.) The initiative also calls for better reporting of AI R&D spending by agencies, in order to create an overview of how much is spent across the government.

2) Infrastructure. Agencies are expected to help researchers access federal data, algorithms, and computer processing.

3) Governance. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and other groups will together draft general guidelines for governing AI to ensure its safe and ethical use. The official couldn’t say which specific issues the effort would address, but noted that it will involve experts from the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Defense, and other agencies. The senior administration official noted that one concern is protecting data privacy.

4) Workforce. The White House’s AI advisory committee and its council on job training will look for ways to continue workers’ educations. In addition, agencies will be asked to create fellowships and training programs in computer science.

5) International engagement. The administration hopes to perform a delicate balancing act: collaborating on AI with other countries, while not compromising U.S. interests or ceding any technological edge. The official deflected questions about how engagement efforts might address China’s challenges to U.S. interests, and did not say whether the initiative would address immigration and visas for scientists, engineers, and students.

CONTINUE READING HERE.

Here is the text and link to the E/O (key word used:  “Fully traceable”….this could be set to expose how our privacy and liberties have been violated by AI and pave the way for tech that does not violate the basic rights of you and me…)

Executive Order on Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence

 INFRASTRUCTURE & TECHNOLOGY

 Issued on: 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy and Principles.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to drive growth of the United States economy, enhance our economic and national security, and improve our quality of life. The United States is the world leader in AI research and development (R&D) and deployment.  Continued American leadership in AI is of paramount importance to maintaining the economic and national security of the United States and to shaping the global evolution of AI in a manner consistent with our Nation’s values, policies, and priorities.  The Federal Government plays an important role in facilitating AI R&D, promoting the trust of the American people in the development and deployment of AI-related technologies, training a workforce capable of using AI in their occupations, and protecting the American AI technology base from attempted acquisition by strategic competitors and adversarial nations.  Maintaining American leadership in AI requires a concerted effort to promote advancements in technology and innovation, while protecting American technology, economic and national security, civil liberties, privacy, and American values and enhancing international and industry collaboration with foreign partners and allies.  It is the policy of the United States Government to sustain and enhance the scientific, technological, and economic leadership position of the United States in AI R&D and deployment through a coordinated Federal Government strategy, the American AI Initiative (Initiative), guided by five principles:

(a)  The United States must drive technological breakthroughs in AI across the Federal Government, industry, and academia in order to promote scientific discovery, economic competitiveness, and national security.

(b)  The United States must drive development of appropriate technical standards and reduce barriers to the safe testing and deployment of AI technologies in order to enable the creation of new AI-related industries and the adoption of AI by today’s industries.

(c)  The United States must train current and future generations of American workers with the skills to develop and apply AI technologies to prepare them for today’s economy and jobs of the future.

(d)  The United States must foster public trust and confidence in AI technologies and protect civil liberties, privacy, and American values in their application in order to fully realize the potential of AI technologies for the American people.

(e)  The United States must promote an international environment that supports American AI research and innovation and opens markets for American AI industries, while protecting our technological advantage in AI and protecting our critical AI technologies from acquisition by strategic competitors and adversarial nations.

Sec. 2.  Objectives.  Artificial Intelligence will affect the missions of nearly all executive departments and agencies (agencies).  Agencies determined to be implementing agencies pursuant to section 3 of this order shall pursue six strategic objectives in furtherance of both promoting and protecting American advancements in AI:

(a)  Promote sustained investment in AI R&D in collaboration with industry, academia, international partners and allies, and other non-Federal entities to generate technological breakthroughs in AI and related technologies and to rapidly transition those breakthroughs into capabilities that contribute to our economic and national security.

(b)  Enhance access to high-quality and fully traceable Federal data, models, and computing resources to increase the value of such resources for AI R&D, while maintaining safety, security, privacy, and confidentiality protections consistent with applicable laws and policies.

(c)  Reduce barriers to the use of AI technologies to promote their innovative application while protecting American technology, economic and national security, civil liberties, privacy, and values.

(d)  Ensure that technical standards minimize vulnerability to attacks from malicious actors and reflect Federal priorities for innovation, public trust, and public confidence in systems that use AI technologies; and develop international standards to promote and protect those priorities.

(e)  Train the next generation of American AI researchers and users through apprenticeships; skills programs; and education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), with an emphasis on computer science, to ensure that American workers, including Federal workers, are capable of taking full advantage of the opportunities of AI.

(f)  Develop and implement an action plan, in accordance with the National Security Presidential Memorandum of February 11, 2019 (Protecting the United States Advantage in Artificial Intelligence and Related Critical Technologies) (the NSPM) to protect the advantage of the United States in AI and technology critical to United States economic and national security interests against strategic competitors and foreign adversaries.

Sec. 3.  Roles and Responsibilities.  The Initiative shall be coordinated through the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (Select Committee).  Actions shall be implemented by agencies that conduct foundational AI R&D, develop and deploy applications of AI technologies, provide educational grants, and regulate and provide guidance for applications of AI technologies, as determined by the co-chairs of the NSTC Select Committee (implementing agencies).

Sec. 4.  Federal Investment in AI Research and Development.

(a)  Heads of implementing agencies that also perform or fund R&D (AI R&D agencies), shall consider AI as an agency R&D priority, as appropriate to their respective agencies’ missions, consistent with applicable law and in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) R&D priorities memoranda.  Heads of such agencies shall take this priority into account when developing budget proposals and planning for the use of funds in Fiscal Year 2020 and in future years.  Heads of these agencies shall also consider appropriate administrative actions to increase focus on AI for 2019.

(b)  Heads of AI R&D agencies shall budget an amount for AI R&D that is appropriate for this prioritization.

(i)   Following the submission of the President’s Budget request to the Congress, heads of such agencies shall communicate plans for achieving this prioritization to the OMB Director and the OSTP Director each fiscal year through the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program.

(ii)   Within 90 days of the enactment of appropriations for their respective agencies, heads of such agencies shall identify each year, consistent with applicable law, the programs to which the AI R&D priority will apply and estimate the total amount of such funds that will be spent on each such program.  This information shall be communicated to the OMB Director and OSTP Director each fiscal year through the NITRD Program.

(c)  To the extent appropriate and consistent with applicable law, heads of AI R&D agencies shall explore opportunities for collaboration with non-Federal entities, including:  the private sector; academia; non-profit organizations; State, local, tribal, and territorial governments; and foreign partners and allies, so all collaborators can benefit from each other’s investment and expertise in AI R&D.

Sec. 5.  Data and Computing Resources for AI Research and Development.

(a)  Heads of all agencies shall review their Federal data and models to identify opportunities to increase access and use by the greater non-Federal AI research community in a manner that benefits that community, while protecting safety, security, privacy, and confidentiality.  Specifically, agencies shall improve data and model inventory documentation to enable discovery and usability, and shall prioritize improvements to access and quality of AI data and models based on the AI research community’s user feedback.

(i)    Within 90 days of the date of this order, the OMB Director shall publish a notice in the Federal Register inviting the public to identify additional requests for access or quality improvements for Federal data and models that would improve AI R&D and testing.  Additionally, within 90 days of the date of this order, OMB, in conjunction with the Select Committee, shall investigate barriers to access or quality limitations of Federal data and models that impede AI R&D and testing.  Collectively, these actions by OMB will help to identify datasets that will facilitate non-Federal AI R&D and testing.

(ii)   Within 120 days of the date of this order, OMB, including through its interagency councils and the Select Committee, shall update implementation guidance for Enterprise Data Inventories and Source Code Inventories to support discovery and usability in AI R&D.

(iii)  Within 180 days of the date of this order, and in accordance with the implementation of the Cross-Agency Priority Goal:  Leveraging Federal Data as a Strategic Asset, from the March 2018 President’s Management Agenda, agencies shall consider methods of improving the quality, usability, and appropriate access to priority data identified by the AI research community.  Agencies shall also identify any associated resource implications.

(iv)   In identifying data and models for consideration for increased public access, agencies, in coordination with the Senior Agency Officials for Privacy established pursuant to Executive Order 13719 of February 9, 2016 (Establishment of the Federal Privacy Council), the heads of Federal statistical entities, Federal program managers, and other relevant personnel shall identify any barriers to, or requirements associated with, increased access to and use of such data and models, including:

(A)  privacy and civil liberty protections for individuals who may be affected by increased access and use, as well as confidentiality protections for individuals and other data providers;

(B)  safety and security concerns, including those related to the association or compilation of data and models;

(C)  data documentation and formatting, including the need for interoperable and machine-readable data formats;

(D)  changes necessary to ensure appropriate data and system governance; and

(E)  any other relevant considerations.

(v)    In accordance with the President’s Management Agenda and the Cross-Agency Priority Goal:  Leveraging Data as a Strategic Asset, agencies shall identify opportunities to use new technologies and best practices to increase access to and usability of open data and models, and explore appropriate controls on access to sensitive or restricted data and models, consistent with applicable laws and policies, privacy and confidentiality protections, and civil liberty protections.

(b)  The Secretaries of Defense, Commerce, Health and Human Services, and Energy, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Director of the National Science Foundation shall, to the extent appropriate and consistent with applicable law, prioritize the allocation of high-performance computing resources for AI-related applications through:

(i)   increased assignment of discretionary allocation of resources and resource reserves; or

(ii)  any other appropriate mechanisms.

(c)  Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Select Committee, in coordination with the General Services Administration (GSA), shall submit a report to the President making recommendations on better enabling the use of cloud computing resources for federally funded AI R&D.

(d)  The Select Committee shall provide technical expertise to the American Technology Council on matters regarding AI and the modernization of Federal technology, data, and the delivery of digital services, as appropriate.

Sec. 6.  Guidance for Regulation of AI Applications.

(a)  Within 180 days of the date of this order, the OMB Director, in coordination with the OSTP Director, the Director of the Domestic Policy Council, and the Director of the National Economic Council, and in consultation with any other relevant agencies and key stakeholders as the OMB Director shall determine, shall issue a memorandum to the heads of all agencies that shall:

(i)   inform the development of regulatory and non‑regulatory approaches by such agencies regarding technologies and industrial sectors that are either empowered or enabled by AI, and that advance American innovation while upholding civil liberties, privacy, and American values; and

(ii)  consider ways to reduce barriers to the use of AI technologies in order to promote their innovative application while protecting civil liberties, privacy, American values, and United States economic and national security.

(b)  To help ensure public trust in the development and implementation of AI applications, OMB shall issue a draft version of the memorandum for public comment before it is finalized.

(c)  Within 180 days of the date of the memorandum described in subsection (a) of this section, the heads of implementing agencies that also have regulatory authorities shall review their authorities relevant to applications of AI and shall submit to OMB plans to achieve consistency with the memorandum.

(d)  Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce, through the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), shall issue a plan for Federal engagement in the development of technical standards and related tools in support of reliable, robust, and trustworthy systems that use AI technologies.  NIST shall lead the development of this plan with participation from relevant agencies as the Secretary of Commerce shall determine.

(i)   Consistent with OMB Circular A-119, this plan shall include:

(A) Federal priority needs for standardization of AI systems development and deployment;

(B) identification of standards development entities in which Federal agencies should seek membership with the goal of establishing or supporting United States technical leadership roles; and

(C) opportunities for and challenges to United States leadership in standardization related to AI technologies.

(ii)  This plan shall be developed in consultation with the Select Committee, as needed, and in consultation with the private sector, academia, non‑governmental entities, and other stakeholders, as appropriate.

Sec. 7.  AI and the American Workforce.

(a)  Heads of implementing agencies that also provide educational grants shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, consider AI as a priority area within existing Federal fellowship and service programs.

(i)   Eligible programs for prioritization shall give preference to American citizens, to the extent permitted by law, and shall include:

(A)  high school, undergraduate, and graduate fellowship; alternative education; and training programs;

(B)  programs to recognize and fund early-career university faculty who conduct AI R&D, including through Presidential awards and recognitions;

(C)  scholarship for service programs;

(D)  direct commissioning programs of the United States Armed Forces; and

(E)  programs that support the development of instructional programs and curricula that encourage the integration of AI technologies into courses in order to facilitate personalized and adaptive learning experiences for formal and informal education and training.

(ii)  Agencies shall annually communicate plans for achieving this prioritization to the co-chairs of the Select Committee.

(b)  Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Select Committee shall provide recommendations to the NSTC Committee on STEM Education regarding AI-related educational and workforce development considerations that focus on American citizens.

(c)  The Select Committee shall provide technical expertise to the National Council for the American Worker on matters regarding AI and the American workforce, as appropriate.

Sec. 8.  Action Plan for Protection of the United States Advantage in AI Technologies.

(a)  As directed by the NSPM, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, in coordination with the OSTP Director and the recipients of the NSPM, shall organize the development of an action plan to protect the United States advantage in AI and AI technology critical to United States economic and national security interests against strategic competitors and adversarial nations.

(b)  The action plan shall be provided to the President within 120 days of the date of this order, and may be classified in full or in part, as appropriate.

(c)  Upon approval by the President, the action plan shall be implemented by all agencies who are recipients of the NSPM, for all AI-related activities, including those conducted pursuant to this order.

Sec. 9.  Definitions.  As used in this order:

(a)  the term “artificial intelligence” means the full extent of Federal investments in AI, to include:  R&D of core AI techniques and technologies; AI prototype systems; application and adaptation of AI techniques; architectural and systems support for AI; and cyberinfrastructure, data sets, and standards for AI; and

(b)  the term “open data” shall, in accordance with OMB Circular A-130 and memorandum M-13-13, mean “publicly available data structured in a way that enables the data to be fully discoverable and usable by end users.”

Sec. 10.  General Provisions.

(a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
February 11, 2019.

MrMBB333 ~ Awesome Purple Sky From Sweden! and Update on “Venezuela Fireball” –

editor victoria’s comment ~ i searched the internet for another source for this and couldn’t find a thing.  i’ve seen video’s and images of portions of a sky with the purple glow/color.  but this?  this is the entire sky (panoramic view) and i wish i had more to share of this with you.  to see just the purple skies, go to the 2:19 mark.  taken this week in south sweden.  amazing!  i’m thinking maybe plasma gas causing this effect (given we have been blasted with plasma off and on for some time now).  i found the following on plasma gas and the different colors it can exhibit:  

Plasma causes stimulation of atoms so that there valence electrons are elevated to a higher energy level or even are able to exit from the nuclear shell. In the later case a positive ion and a free electron result from the stimulation, As stimulated electrons try to return to their basic state and positive ions try to catch free electrons in any stationary plasma allways also inverse processes are active, i.e. recombination to the basic state. As during the process of recombination the atom returns to lower energy the resulting energy  is emitted in form of electromagnetic radiation. The energy quantum emitted in case of recombination of an ion and an electron is very high and the high energy radiation resulting is invisible UV. The radiation caused by an electron returning from a stimulated level to the basic level usually is emitted in form of visible radiation. As the band gap between the basic level and elevated levels within a nuclear shell is an energy amount typical for any atom, also the frequency of the electromagnetic radiation emitted is characteristic for any specific atom. This results in a colour typical for any specific process gas used to generate a plasma.

Typical colours are for example:

CF4: blue SF6: milky blueSiF4: light blueSiCl4: light blue Cl2: milky green CCl4:light green H2: rose O2: milky yellow N2: red to yellow Br2: red He: red to violett Ne: pure red Ar: dark red  (SOURCE)

******

Published on Feb 10, 2019

 

 

It’s Official: Researchers Have Discovered A Second Earth

 

editor victoria’s comment ~ who knows about this one.  my excited self says “new earth!”  just a frequency adjustment away.  soft disclosure perhaps?  interesting name too – Proxima (B).  proxima – the nearest star to the sun…[wp-svg-icons icon=”heart-2″ wrap=”i”]

******

on 

Researchers have confirmed the existence of a SECOND Earth located in the Proxima Centauri System. The planet is believed to have oceans just like Earth and may hay host alien life. In the past, thousands of exoplanets have been discovered in the universe, but none of them is like Proxima B.

Proxima b, as has been baptized, has very ‘promising characteristics’: it is probably rocky, slightly more massive than our own planet and is located in the region around its star that would allow liquid water on its surface to exist.

Researchers have discovered a planet located in the Proxima Centauri system, one of the closest stars to Earth which they believe harbors liquid water and potentially alien life. The planet, named Proxima B is believed to be around 1.3 times the size of our planet and has the ideal temperature on the surface for water in a liquid state to exist.
Proxima B is located four light years away from Earth –over 25 TRILLION MILES—meaning that in order to visit the planet in the near future, future generation would have to come up with super-fast spacecraft that would allow them to travel to the Proxima Centauri system with ease. If the planet proves to be ‘a SECOND Earth’ it could become one of the best options for future human colonization.
CONTINUE READING HERE.

Timeline Jumpage, “Stargate” Sighting, A(nother) Fake Moon Landing, and a CME [UPDATED]

 

Editor Victoria’s Comment ~ A portion of a current piece by Schrodinger’s Cat.  I would like to add that a Stargate is a mechanical construct that creates the energy field to allow a portal to appear.  They are not the same thing but do work together.  Interesting they call it an exit portal – which was my feel as well. And that CME I feel could be that Stargate powering itself.  It has structure to it that made me question whether it is indeed a CME.  

******

Also, someone accidentally got the following pic (after two normal pics) when they were trying to take a picture of rainbow clouds around the sun:

Thanks to the commenter who pointed out the video. The eponymous 333rd MrMBB likened the above to a stargate… which is indeed what it looks like, but… that’s not exactly what’s captured here. We’re still not sure what it is. This is an artificial construct… but it’s not a portal, exactly. It’s kinda… “vacuumy”… but… well, we’ll let you know when we find out. How’s that for vague?

[UPDATE: Ok, it’s just an exit portal, and a rather primitive one. It has a weird suction to it, which is why we said, “vacuumy.” Yes, vacuumy is a word. Now.]

CONTINUE READING HERE.