Anonymous605232 >>605197 Twatter in receivership in 24 days? Shut em down!
72C68DD2-F512-4DC8-ADA8-E….jpeg CAFB8AB7-539E-4AFB-9EC0-E….jpeg
Anonymous599714 >>599682 True, but then why Snowden? Doesn’t make sense. If they gave him the tool, Snowden isn’t of value to the NSA other than a trophy. The tech lives outside of him and Q claims that they own CIA at this point (making assumptions). This is unfolding as if Snowden has something that no one else has access to. Snowden has fame for taking files and exposing, not of someone that developed technology that no one else has. Something not adding up.
Q!UW.yye1fxo599627 >>599614 100% Regulated. Some platforms will collapse under own weight of illegal activities. Q
Anonymous599614 >>599607 Q are we going to have more freedom of speech on “private” public speech services or not? please answer this question
Anonymous599581 Every user on Twitter will soon be able to apply for a coveted blue tick verification mark, the company’s CEO Jack Dorsey said in a live stream on Thursday. Using Periscope from the firm’s San Francisco headquarters, Twitter executives revealed the process was being reworked from the ground up. They said the current system creates confusion and can imply credibility, but stressed that it will still be important to let users have a way to evaluate if profiles are legitimate. http://www .newsweek.com/how-get-verified-twitter-process-be-open-everyone-ceo-jack-dorsey-says-837590
Anonymous598223
CC1B1FD7-8B70-4CEB-A4F7-F5….png